Norman Mailer – his own hill of beans
I quail at the idea of writing a single novel, let alone a string of huge books ringing with self-belief. So I respect Norman Mailer’s achievements as a creator deeply, though I have never particularly taken to his literature.
The one book I loved was Of a Fire on the Moon, which is based on an account of the first moon landing. Written shortly after the event, it managed to nail for me the sense in which the story defines the progress and history of a civilisation; something I needed since I was floored by the indifference of my young friends to the whole Apollo thing.
It contained a vignette I remember to this day. Each astronaut was allowed to carry one small container which was completely private, and theirs alone. It marked their individuality. Soon, they would learn to carry stamps, which could be sold later, but Neil Armstrong did something different.
In the fifteen minutes while the module settled its feet onto the moon, he prayed, pulled out a wafer marked with a cross, and took Communion. I’ve always been moved by that, perhaps because I was raised in the same religious tradition. At the pinnacle of technological achievement, robotised by practice, defined in every gesture, kept alive by oxygen and physics, further from the herd warmth than any person has ever been, he reached back to the origins of human consciousness and lived out one of the great ceremonies of atavistic rebirth and sacrifice. In the spring comes the sun and the ripening corn.
I read Of a Fire on the Moon thirty-five years ago, after buying it from a brave Adelaide bookstore which (gasp!) imported American books, and defied the British publishing cartels. It gave us Pynchon, Ferlinghetti, Sontag, Didion and the Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers.
I remain indebted to the East Coast American writers for the fluidity of their prose, their joy in bravura, and their insistence on the value of the personal and the unstable subjective. The bombastically described “New Journalism” was hugely significant in the development of popular non-fiction, even though it quickly collided with its own limits. Mailer was one of its pioneers, publishing The Village Voice with Ed Fancher and Dan Wolf in 1955, and burrowing his quasi-journalistic way through such cultural fault lines as The Armies of the Night and The Executioner’s Song.
In my smaller, Anglo-saxon petit-bourgeois parvenu immigrant soul, I have never been able to comprehend literary lions, those agonised, bellowing carnivores of the literary Serengeti, obsessed with fame, breeding and marrying and writing seemingly by priapic impulse. I see myself as a kind of short-sighted giraffe, munching leaves above it all, blurrily vague on the details, tripping knock-kneed and spindle-legged on bones and burrows. Mailer and his vastly gushing American mates demand their faces carved in stone on mountain tops, while I want to amount to the proverbial hill of beans. I am content to survive, and I celebrate those who want more.
The very title Of a Fire on the Moon is an example of something which is a collective signature of these writers. My eye is hooked by the phrase, and I long to edit it. In my memory, it is always called A Fire on the Moon.
In 1982, sitting on a polished floor of a house in Costa Rica, I went into a rant about prolixity and concision as national characteristics of American and British writers.
I read aloud Tom Wolfe’s description of Chuck Yaeger’s plane accident in The Right Stuff, a dancing, howling monologue in which sentences disintegrate into flying sparks. Yaeger battled to control the NF-104 rocket-augmented aerospace trainer as it fell over a hundred thousand feet. He finally baled out, with burning rocket fuel trapped in his helmet. When he landed in a ploughed field, he packed his parachute and stood at attention as an archetypical American farmer and his awed son raced to them in a pickup truck. The account was a fabulous arc of noisy fragments, which dropped us back to earth just as the magic lit up in the child’s eyes.
Then I read the first page of Graham Greene’s The Quiet American. In a couple of paragraphs he describes a bicycle bomb exploding in a marketplace. The thing is a small masterpiece, transparent before the event, as we glide hypnotically into some of the deep collective reflexes which create the horror of our times. I can’t do either, but I know what I wish I could command.
The photograph at the head shows Gunter Grass and Norman Mailer together last year. Grass is bucolic and full of rude health, while Mailer is sliding towards the tomb that has now opened for him. The contrast is purely accidental, a thing of DNA and molecular shock and cosmic rays, but does seem to carry a small indecency. After he studied aeronautical engineering at Harvard, Mailer was drafted into the army in 1943, served in The Philippines, and turned the experience into The Naked and the Dead. Four years younger, Grass grew up under the Nazis, was conscripted into the labour corps at the age of sixteen, and ended up as an assistant tank gunner. His first novel, suffused by modern German history, was The Tin Drum, a pioneering work of magic realism.
He too became a literary lion, and used his writing and status as a platform to engage with Germany as it absorbed the guilt of Hitler and the Holocaust, and the nation’s bizarre, schizoid journey to acceptance, amnesia and the Osti wasteland. He emphasised the problem of the self in this with his own sad limitation – as we all know now, he was a member of the Waffen-SS and he hid the fact. His problem was not what he did, because he didn’t do anything, but the fact that he allowed a false history to go forward.
I suppose that story of Grass illuminates Mailer as well, and all of us. Mailer, in full cry, made a public idiot of himself several times – but he confessed his folly and took his lumps while Grass allowed his small, pathetic sin of omission to fester. We are such strange mixtures of idealism and venality.
But that is the kind of thing which Graham Greene would understand.
—————
The original Time Magazine review of Of a Fire…, tries to emulate Mailer’s extraordinary shuttle between self and world, scientific event and reflections on humanity, ego and machine, empiricism and religion. It is truly crapulous.
Most of the information here comes from Wikipedia.
(Update: surprisingly, the edition of A Fire on the Moon available in Australia was actually called Fire on the Moon.)


November 11th, 2007 at 7:55 pm
What a great post. Thanks.
November 11th, 2007 at 10:34 pm
I love the way reflection can at times catch on fire, around here.
Makes one want to be much older, deeper, knowledgeable. And then younger, to crack the whip and go it again.
November 12th, 2007 at 3:24 pm
Nice Mailer post. Or post-Mailer post.
Anyway, a small correction: it was Aldrin, not Armstrong. If the auctioneers are to be believed.
November 14th, 2007 at 11:27 am
“I have never been able to comprehend literary lions, those agonised, bellowing carnivores of the literary Serengeti, obsessed with fame, breeding and marrying and writing seemingly by priapic impulse. I see myself as a kind of short-sighted giraffe, munching leaves above it all, blurrily vague on the details, tripping knock-kneed and spindle-legged on bones and burrows. Mailer and his vastly gushing American mates demand their faces carved in stone on mountain tops, while I want to amount to the proverbial hill of beans. I am content to survive, and I celebrate those who want more.”
this has to be one of the most brilliant paragraphs I’ve read all year. Nice one, David!
And oh, yes, me too. though more I don’t think I’m a giraffe. Maybe a purple bottomed baboon?
November 18th, 2007 at 10:55 pm
David, that is without a doubt one of the best blogposts I’ve ever read.
November 20th, 2007 at 2:54 am
Barista:
If you were in Guenther Grass’ shoes and had been formerly a member of the Waffen-SS, what would you have done? [Same goes for a former member of the KMT in Mao's China].
Never never never underestimate the strength of underlying hatreds in Europe – some Europeans are still fighting the Counter-Reformation and the Thirty Years War; or go to the Balkans and you can get killed today for what happened a century before the Fall Of Constantinople. I don’t blame Grass for not wanting to be beaten up one dark night by a mob of skinheads from Eastern Europe.
It’s easy to overlook all this in easy-going tolerant Australia ….but even in Australia, had Grass migrated here, became a useful and respected member of the community and then years later revealed he had been in the Waffen-SS, he would still have been deported.
b.t.w., That’s a surprising photo you’ve put up there.
November 20th, 2007 at 9:29 am
‘ “New Journalism” was hugely significant in the development of popular non-fiction, even though it quickly collided with its own limits.’
Heh, nice. Terrific post, David, that hill of beans isn’t doing you any harm from where I sit.
November 20th, 2007 at 10:18 pm
Barista, you said ” “I quail at the idea of writing a single novel, let alone a string of huge books ringing with self-belief” “. But isn’t writing a novel sometimes a matter of sketching out a framework [preferably an original and inspired one] and then filling it in with details, one brick at a time?
Not impressed by “Literary Lions” nor by most other celebrities though I have enjoyed reading the works of rather prolific writers, few of whom could be called literary lions.
Agree with Mark’s compliment – that paragraph painted a picture in vivid colours.
December 22nd, 2007 at 6:06 pm
Fabulous piece David. Thanks – I’d not come across it before.
January 7th, 2008 at 4:47 pm
Am I ill informed that the Waffen SS were not part of the death camp scene ? I enjoyed reading Barista’s thought on Mailer and Grass.
February 5th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
[...] Next year, you really should consider volunteering to help out with BB08 – that is the Best Blogs for the year series that James Farrell is currently editing with the help of a few of us. There’s some dross of course – which gets most of us grumpy! And then there are some marvellous posts. One of several I’ve particularly liked was Barista’s obituary to Norman Mailer. [...]
March 7th, 2008 at 10:57 pm
i was wondering whether the title “there are none as deaf as those who will not hear” is quoted from a certain author or it was written by David Barista