a little hollow for the soul

“The people in my films are exactly like myself – creatures of instinct, of rather poor intellectual capacity, who at best only think while they’re talking. .. Mostly they’re body with a little hollow for the soul.”
The deaths of Ingmar Bergman and Michelango Antonioni on the same day brings to a close forever the work of a pioneering generation of filmmakers who constructed the very idea that film could be a work of art.
Bergman was the last great auteur director of his kind to stand on location next to a 35mm camera. Saraband was shown just last year on the festival circuit. Antonioni had a stroke in 1985, which almost ended his cinema career.
Before Bergman and Antonioni, film went from a carnival attraction to an industrial process. The generation of Lang, Hitchcock, Griffith, Ford and Chaplin came to cinema as adults, and invented the professional roles, vocabularies and methods to tell stories to millions with the distinctive eye of artists.
Elsewhere in the world, away from Hollywood and its own European connections, cinema was brought to artistic maturity by directors like Bresson, Dreyer, Ozu, Rosselini and Renoir.
Born slightly later, and living much longer, Bergman and Antonioni have become the enduring icons of the art movie, and clichés in popular culture. Bergman is seen as wallowing in a trough of doom; Antonioni as a dude who makes no sense at all.
Both versions are a travesty. Bergman made comedies, explored the use of colour and worked brilliantly with children. Antonioni was responsible for Blow Up, Zabriskie Point and The Passenger, which bring an older, European eye to the evolution of late twentieth century public culture.
Bergman was steeped in Western culture, and worked with a small cadre of craftspeople and a close ensemble of actors who shared the same vocabulary and historical values. It is no accident that Sven Nykvist, Liv Ullman and Max von Sydow could create such luminous intensity together.
He inherited a vibrant theatre tradition, which contributed through Strindberg to the exploration of naturalism and the realism which is at the heart of the screen arts over the last century.
As an artist, he put the actor and character at the centre of the frame and the process. He was unafraid of stillness, content to watch, absorbed in the great mysteries and depth of a human being struggling with life itself.
In himself, he had all the frailties of an ordinary human being, who fought with the tax department and built toilets on set so he could shit himself with fear.
In the sacred space of shared artistic process, Bergman was unflinching and profound, full of joy and pity, laconic and dark, playful and despairing. His ability and vision took him far beyond the cinema. He was extraordinarily active in the other performed arts – in television, theatre and opera. He was prolific, energetic and fecund.
Antonioni, too, worked on a larger canvas than the cinema. He started as a film reviewer, and turned to painting and short stories after his stroke.
In contrast to Bergman’s artistic traditionalism, he was the first truly valorised modernist of the cinema, who took the medium forwards into wider artistic possibilities.
He was able to embrace a world in which certainty and continuity are no more than a carapace. He was fascinated by discontinuity, disappointment, the world between objects, the unintelligible gesture and the unanswered question.
In The Passenger, Jack Nicholson sits at the back of an open sports car as Maria Schneider asks him what they are running away from. He tells her to look. The camera lingers on the road endlessly spinning away from them, out to the vanishing point between lines of trees. In the same shot, there is nothing and everything.
In Bergman’s most iconic work, The Seventh Seal, the central characters dance joyously with Death on the crest of a hill.
In the last sequence of Zabriskie Point we see the ranch house on the cliff explode savagely again and again, before we see the interior burst apart and fly off to the music of Pink Floyd, serene in its own destruction down to the clothes and the books. A moment later, a trash song tells us that “If you live just for the day, the day may soon be done, but there’s a space where dreams always stay so young..”
There is a moment in The Seventh Seal when a character staggers from a line of flagellants and shouts into the camera the most basic message of all – the line which has overwhelmed both Bergman and Antonioni on the same day.
“We’re all going to die.”
Defiance and mortality. Ennui and hope. Despair and acceptance.
————–
The Guardian obituaries of Antonioni and Bergman are excellent.
There is a collection of videos about Bergman making his last film, Saraband, here.
YouTube has the last fantastic tracking shot in The Passenger, with its utterly simple camera trick, and the explosion sequence in Zabriskie Point. You can also find tributes to both filmmakers.
The Swedes are in mourning. This site covers him extensively, and includes clips.
I wrote this today for Screen Hub. It is pretty rough but I needed to be fast, and the connection between the two invites a lot of thought. These two people stretch my mind and spirit. They enlarge my understanding of humanity.

August 2nd, 2007 at 3:48 am
[...] Yahoo Contact the Webmaster Link to Article youtube a little hollow for the soul » Posted at Barista on Wednesday, August 01, 2007 [ seventh seal end scene] “The people in my films are exactly like myself – creatures of instinct, of rather poor intellectual capacity, who at best only think while they’re talking. .. Mostly they’re body with a little hollow for the soul.” The deaths of Ingmar Bergman and Michelango Antonioni on the same day brings to a close forever the work View Original Article » [...]
August 2nd, 2007 at 9:16 am
“These two people stretch my mind and spirit.” Yes. “They enlarge my understanding of humanity.” Yes.
They also confirm something, something that doesn’t need to get defined and sometimes can’t be, but is there in us from the get.
August 2nd, 2007 at 11:38 pm
That piece is chock full of wonder-full evocative phrases; it’s more than a post, and more than I’ve described. Well done, David. So much richness provided there. It must be a tough call to write up something when, from reading the above, worlds are born and grow and collide and meld, and to know more of it and not get it in would feel unsatisfying.
This brought me into the magic of it; of course, to want to know more is part of it, but I felt satisfied from this, given the work and reputation of these guys. Having read through this piece I wonder for how much we are losing elsewhere in what is given us; this shows that the space of half a page can enrich while being freely easy to read in this, our hectic, demanding lives. Just want to add appreciation for it.
It’s important to make art real. Excellence has given way to difference – “I must be excellent” has given way to “I must be different” in art, in late decades. At least aiming for excellence asks the artist to dig deep; a toilet at hand if needs be. That question is a good place to start. Being merely (modernly) different asks nothing of that.
This is an artist’s piece. So much more to convey, of course. But it is part of the process that, in reaching up to grasp this which would fill the hollow of soul, and bring it down, and make it real in daily life through word or some physical implement, is to stand on it: lifting us that much higher, to see more, to need to reach again.
Bloody great stuff. I hope you’ve been moved and inspired by what these guys represent, as you’ve grabbed hold of. And thanks again for the writing of it.
August 2nd, 2007 at 11:56 pm
Defiance and mortality. Ennui and hope. Despair and acceptance.
The story of my (inner) life as a young man.
Thanks, David.
August 3rd, 2007 at 3:15 pm
Melbourne University early 1960s.
Bergman, Antonioni, et. al. brought to us suburban naifs courtesy of the avant garde who ran MUFS.
Thanks MUFS folks.
August 3rd, 2007 at 5:58 pm
David, a brilliant piece – obituary, review, essay – it all that and more, and brilliant.
August 4th, 2007 at 1:37 pm
Should be in the paper, David. Very fine.
August 6th, 2007 at 1:47 pm
[...] ~ David Barista Tiley also posts an excellent obituary (with lots of links) on the deaths of Bergman and Antonioni. [...]
July 22nd, 2008 at 6:30 am
[...] in Melbourne from May 22, which gives me an excuse to link to this brilliant piece by David Tiley following the deaths of Michelangelo Antonioni and Ingmar Bergmar, focusing [...]